... considerations ...

Few considerations, as i repeatedly said, I don't have nearly as many answers as I do have questions, please follow my links and meditate. This post is not looking for comments or suggestions from strangers, therefore they would not be welcomed, unless we know each other in an intimate way. This post gives questions to the ones that have questions, and gives sources of reflection to the ones who want to use their own brain. Weather you think you know the answers in your mind, or you may think you have better theories than I do, or whatever, I do not need your feedback on this. In my philosophy the questions are my answers, if you don't like them, go read somebody else blog and have a good day.

-reincarnation - DNA - physical - parallel lives - global consciousness - universal consciousness - sync - DNA re ocurence - could be a law of nature empirically verified ?

-effects of going from large number logic in re-generation to bio-genetics - alters natural selection - can be damaging ? - yes and no - postmortem cloning - rules ? - need of new legislation ? - can catastrophe be avoided re-engineering the dead ? - who is the judge of this judgment ?

-soul - aggregated function - life - consciousness - occurs after birth - ends at death - harmonics floating in a time-space could be perceived-captured ? - vibrations - waves - hope somebody may build me a brain recorder so that i could store souls

-biggest human evil - genocide - unique to humans - dominance - right/wrong - comes from fanaticism - fanaticism requires a theory and power - so it requires public power and ideology - humanism is the source of most ideologies - socialism and religions are an example of humanist ideology - ideology produces ethics whereas what is not convenient to the ideology is repressed

-human ethics have a major problem, because the nature of good and evil is discriminatory, where what is right for one is evil if applied to his enemy - whatever perpetuates its status quo is perceived as good, whatever subverses its dogmas is perceived as evil - humanism substitutes to natural selection, the social selection of the compliant thus producing boneless and mindless humans, ready to perpetrate the destiny of the clan, and to curse the ones that are not part of it

-the only alternative to humanism and ethics is universalism - under universalistic view winners and losers are still a bunch of uncivilized and ignorant animals in the hands of superior forces they can not control - the society can suppress the individual universalist, and it does frequently because his presence reminds their giant egos that there are things they can not control - the society, religious or governmental, can do nothing to suppress universal forces and universal laws - money can not buy slower melting of the poles, or milder earthquakes - and military or political power neither

-universal forces are driven by relations of cause-effect that are not linear - can a flap of a butterfly in California cause a tsunami in Thailand ? - somebody may bear control of the greatest forces in loneliness and in loneliness can alter the paths of universal forces ? - universal forces don't have preferences - universal forces don't differ between good and evil - they are an equal opportunity constructor and destroyer

-history teaches that winners are right - winners destroy the losers and their culture - history requires friends and enemies - when there aren't any, has to make them up with excuses - the absence of right and wrong makes humanistic toughts, and therefore ideologies, and therefore churches and governments, shallow and useless, "actors", prima-donna extorting natural rights from humans to feed their selfishness

-may the great gardener bring you all an interesting life

:)