What would you think of a public agency (whereas public means SUPPORTED BY TAXPAYERS MONEY and, it should mean, but it seems it does not, IN BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE) that has:
-violated it's own chain of custody rules on publicly owned (means CITIZEN's OWN) materials
-refused to take corrective measures when confronted on the issue from union members
-made the issue into a "personal" one, discriminating against the people aware of the situation
What would you think of a public agency that is MISSING 20% of the materials on it's chain of custody and refuses to take any measures, except persecuting its employees ?
... I personally think that were right the romans, that were writing on marble ... the tables of roman law are still there, in the forum ...
may you all live interesting times
modesto, california, USA this 7/14/2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment