a great disgrace for humanity named morals

-If there were two categories of humans, whereas the first the ones using somebody elses brain and the second the ones using their own it would be easy to define positives and negatives. Reality is more fuzzy, we all use a pecentage of both whereas in the first case sometimes could be a reference to theoretical knowledge, some other times could be a reference to historical or logical considerations.
-The part of our reasoning centered in our own brain, is unfortunally limited by the fact that all things in the universe transform by evolution and randomness we can not fully depict, and is therefore limited on conceiving solutions by engineering, wich brings us, for higher numbers of variables we can not mathematically analyze, to empiric models, thus to the basic concept of any historical model.
-The unfortunate part is that progressing by experience is slow, costly, and unmeasurable on a universal scale we have hard time to understand.
-The second unfortunate effect is that it creates a theorized model of anti-progress applying erroneous empiric models to the human animal istincts. The extreme conclusion of this is very sad. Humans are the only animals capable of genocide and humans that look for solutions in the past rites and "morae" are the most likely ones preparing another genocide or worse.
-The third unfortunate part is the trend. If in evolution the human animal evolved from murder to high efficiency systematic murder (genocide) then would it not make logical sense that humanity 'trends' finally to biocide, whereas biocide could be defined as highest efficiency conceivable genocide ? In this case there is no need to wait for the end of the solar system, we could just press the right button and start the self destruction of the earthlings civilization.

... comments welcome ...