... a clarification needed ...

Just to avoid confusion, here is a brief list of what I personally think should be considered fields of public interest by any nation that does not want to be sooner or later destroyed by its own greed and lack of minimum ethics (like for instance respect of basic human right, or violation of international treaties):

-health and social security
-energy
-defense
-justice

The government has the obbligation to make sure that their personnel curriculum is standardized and untouched by the outside opinion myths of mainly fanatic religious and greed interest groups, and in order to do so, the above departments should have their own academies to train and educate their own personnell internally, and to promote within their own institutions, on the base of verifiable results obtained in the fields of competence for the national interest, without regards for any non governmentally obtained titles or classifications.

Also, as mentioned several times, I believe in freedom of choice for pretty much anything not damaging third parties, like choice of controlling birth, or choice of religion, however I do believe that people that recognise the authority of a divinity above their public duty, are "unfit" for public duty because of conflict of interest and historical patterns of behavior.

I am not sure if I could be defined a good supporter of republics, the older I get and the less tolerance I have for the generalized corruption and lack of basic honesty of such institutions. I have always been loyal to my republic, however I reached the point of thinking that, given a choice, the presumed incompetence of monarchies is way better than the arrogant corruption and lack of ethics and conscience (not in religious sense, but in social sense) of republics.

I think to be a libertarian, because for anything not listed above, I support and believe in deregulation and freedom of enterprise, but poor western choices as "employment at will", "kleptocratization" of social security, "medical poorcide", "corruption and criminalization" of society and "freedom of usury" are subjects where the "real" effects are totally disputable, especially now with the generalized western crisis, tip of the iceberg and prelude to the collapse of the western economy.

I am not sure at this point if the leaders of "free market" preachings, are not as bad as their opponents, and I am starting wondering if the whole big chit-chat of the western "intellighenzia" is sincere, or another scum comparable and equivalent to the churches and the socialist lies.

I would like to see a sign from the "western" world, making evident in the facts that all the cold war doctrine was a real philosophy of thought in favor of freedom, and not just the preaching of some other lunatic Illuminati fanatics, just like their counterparts, but I strongly doubt at this point.

If you follow the pattern of the profits you can always see the truths from the political and holy claims, here a nice exercise, get a piece of paper and list the names and the companies that made profits creating disgraces for humanity, since the year 1901, and meditate.

amen

... about conservation ...

I am quite surprised learning from the discovery channel that "religions" are now in favor of nature conservation. Considering that "religions" are the puppets of power and finance, pursuing historically an agenda of power search and oppressive and savage domination, it makes me laugh the fact that the supporters of no birth control, the inspirators of genocides, and the greedy manipulators of holy finances and perpetrators of holy destruction, wars and crusades, are now trying to depict themselves as conservationists.

I find also astonishing that "scientists" don't dispute such "religious" claims, as pure propaganda. The patterns of behaviors of "religions" in the last forty thousand years don't seem to show that much concern about nature and conservation, as the concern about political power, greed, hate and persecution of whoever would try to dispute their claims of false truth, contrary to any scientific evidence.

I guess that monetary and political power can still purchase a lot of "science". Since the time the sun died and raised in three days, on the southern cross at the solstice of winter, probably about or around the 13200 BCE, at the age of the last polar inversion, the translations of the legend of the shepherds and the books of the law felling off the skies, is still finding believers, an amazing track record for a myth with no substantial historical evidence.

Apparently roman sources mention about a Palestinian guy kind like a Che Guevara of the Empire age, titled "Christ", causing troubles in the middle east, somebody that in our days America would be like a traveling preacher trying to demolish the federal reserve building with a jack hammer, but from this to the whole mythology built in twenty centuries, the difference seems to be quite big.

Probably the doctrine of the church, will need to be revised to rotate around Saint Francis of Assisi, in order to support the new age of christian conservation movement. Well, who knows, it may lead to a progress for Christianity, history will tell. In the mean time churches should probably practice on multiplying breads and fishes, or revise their theories on birth control, because otherwise we may need their miracles once the world population doubles again in the next decade.

... alleanza atlantica ...

A questo punto e' necessario rimettere in discussione se l' america abbia titolo a controllare l'alleanza atlantica, subordinando di fatto gli altri paesi membri. E' oggi chiaro che gli stati uniti violano leggi internazionali e commettono atti criminali contro cittadini di tutto il mondo, incluso il loro paese.

E' ovvio che la credibilita' degli stati uniti non e' a questo punto in una situazione accettabile. Il ruolo degli stati uniti nella NATO danneggia l'immagine di tutti i paesi membri, ed in lungo termine espone i paesi membri ad azioni di rappresaglia causate principalmente dalla presenza statunitense.

Sarebbe pertanto auspicabile che il comando della NATO sia affidato ad una rotazione semestrale, sul modello della comunita' europea, dove ognuno dei paesi membri mantenga un periodo di sei mesi o di un anno di comando, a turno.

Una possibile rotazione potrebbe consistere in tre gruppi membro, US, British Commonwealth ed EU, ed eventualmente altri da definire. All' interno di ogni gruppo puo' essere deciso l'incarico dei paesi membri, in proporzione alla popolazione o ad altro accordo.

Quanto sopra nell' interesse della reputazione internazionale della NATO e dei suoi paesi membri.

... why madness is taking over the world ...

... and what to do about it ...

Coupling available radio frequency technologies with amplification (see NASA silent speaker), reading people mind seems now a reasonable reachable technology.

The problem of governments pushing to "chip" with RFID devices their citizens opens a serious ethical problem, and is a step towards destroying democracy planetwise.

The fact that not only freedom of speech, but also freedom of thought is in danger, may push humanity back thousands of years in history, humans must prepare to fight for their freedom.

I urge people to take action and resist, to prevent the "chip" problem to become the instrument of the new holocaust. Also I invite people to emigrate and support with financial investment, governments and countries with legislation prohibiting human implant of chips, while desupporting financially the countries that plan to implement human chipping technology.

... amen ...

... interesting quotes from honest americans ...

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Benjamin Franklin

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison


"I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." - Thomas Jefferson - Letter to William Ludlow, 1824

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." - Thomas Jefferson

"No man can suffer too much, and no man can fall too soon, if he suffer or if he fall in defense of the liberties and Constitution of his country." - Daniel Webster

"Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster and what has happened once in 6,000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world." - Daniel Webster, 1851

"Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation's economy. The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary: what counts is the issue of control. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property-so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property." - Ominous Parallels, Leonard Peikoff

... rants ...

I just finished reading the troll post number one-zillion and something, over the windows versus Linux OS battle, that other unknown troll has digged, causing a surge of arguing as usual. By the way, the Steve Jobs of Linux are at least two, Stallman and Torvalds, and money is not the metric of everything in the universe as you folks think in amerika.

That's why Saint Francis may have not lived a comfortable life like reverend Dollar (is not a joke, it is his name, Google 'IRS Dollar' and you get the article), but Saint Francis is part of history while reverend Dollar may only remain in the history of the IRS claims, suppose they keep the records of the deceased after death.

Anyways, while I was reading the article, flashes from the past came to my mind, from the times the only Microsoft thing existing, was a BASIC compiler, I think it was called BASCom, was not that bad for the times of CP/M but I used Nevada FORTRAN and COBOL, cheaper, producing portable source for other places than PC's and more useful work.

In the early 80's I was asked an opinion on appropriation plans, and I suggested to give a try to a distributed architecture of servers/workstations of the AT&T B class. For various reasons the choices were however going in different directions, and I therefore opted for Honeywell.

I never had an MS/DOS machine, until Windows became a "standard", mainly for lack of decently priced competitors, Concurrent DOS and DESQviewX were clearly superior, but nobody really bought them for serious projects around the environment I was in, nor bothered to ask what we could have wanted.

Anyways, one day I found out that the geniuses in the engineering area, had appropriated a zillion of DOS machines with Windows 3.0 to build a distributed architecture using the Honeywell servers and LAN Manager network. That's when my battle with viruses started.

Never seen a virus before. Not in VMS, not in GCOS, not in CP/M, not in Xenix, not on Mac OS, so I assume, unless anybody can prove me wrong, viruses officially were introduced to computing with the advent of Microsoft introduced features. The introduction of the problem created two new working positions in my branch, and an entire new office at general services, just to support the PCs (I can't resist not to laugh when somebody talks of windows TCO, I had a GCOS machine with years of uptime, all it did in NINE years was crashing one single LARK disk, and the VAX did not even have a single failure in the same time period, I did not check the uptime but I'm quite sure it was the same).

At this times, the Windows machines troubles, in addition to the other folks mentioned, took half my time, and some unaccountable time from the users trying to fix their system before finally giving up and calling from help, admitting of having been 'bugged' somehow. For whatever reason, my Xenix box was not having any issues either, nor it was the OS/2 server, nor the VAX, nor the GCOS systems, not the Mac's, all on the same network, just DOS and Windows.

Next, I left for a new life and now I had to pay for my own software (sigh). I found some work with this software company, and they had a few VAX, a few Alpha, and a few PCs, we ran Tru64, SCO, VMS and NT. The miracle discovery was that there were no viruses running on the Alpha NT, so in a minute of hope I thought that finally windows x86 and PCs were going to be in a giant future trash can, and Alpha would have became the paradise of Windows computing.

In the mean time, I was running Windows at home, and at the business, struggling with the viruses, and hoping that the new emerging Linux would catch up to be usable as SCO. The main issue was recompiling the kernel, on a 386 sometimes it would take all night. At one point I even had one of the first Slackware and Debian running, with dial-in over the phone, so I could provide a cheap x86 stations running a free OS.

For about seven years after, I was out of the computing business, and during this time my systems were dual boot until the advent of XP. Microsoft in the mean time cancelled the Alpha version, obviously when you have something that works and with no viruses, why keep it, it would look bad if you are in the virus distribution servers market (I did not claim the right for this one, he he).

With XP I decided I was done with MS. I bought one for my kid, that's it. I still run 2k versions, only inside virtual machines, most of the times with the network disconnected, and just to run legacy applications until they are ready for the garbage. I may have to buy one more XP64 maybe, but I hope by the time this XP64 will be good to trash, there may be no more need of Windows and MS for the things I do.

Now I run Debian GNU for multimedia, and develop on Oracle on Fedora, Suse and Solaris. I could use Designer in the Windows VM if I have to, but I generally use XE on the Fedora installs. I found peace, no more viruses, no more wasted time, so hopefully as there were no viruses before Microsoft, the hope remains that there will be none left after Microsoft.

If I had to give advice to anybody, I would suggest to buy a Sparc, dual boot with Solaris and Fedora Core, and an AMD_64, quadruple boot with Fedora, Debian, Suse and Solaris. Also, for the ones that are nostalgic of the times of reliable computing, an old Alpha dual boot with Fedora and VMS is a kick, Alpha core runs very very nice on my Miata. I have not had a chance to own an Itanium 64, that would have been my next wish, possibly with VMS, HP-UX and Debian, and maybe also a newer Ibm 6000, but it may not happen any soon.

... about the bandits (part 2) ...

To be able to define a society as "civilized" it is required the same level of civilization to apply both ways.

As anybody would think is a madness to give an ecclesiastical authority position to each government member, as it was at the times of the "Pharaons", just because of his status, so it is to permit appointing of people who claim to believe in higher authorities than the legitimate governments. The conflict of interest is clear, and so is the basic violation of requirements of unicity of rules and command, making this type of people "unfit" to represent common law interest. I am sure most of the very few religious spirits who are not religious just because of the power and social advantage of being so, may probably agree on this issue. It is quite simple. if you don't believe in a republic because you want a monarchy, don't seek public office and go open the political party for a poll to establish a monarchy, and if you don't believe in the authority of governments because you believe in the highest authority of god, don't seek public office and go open a church.

The second part of this problem, is the misuse of governments funds to finance churches, and the lack of collection of taxes for such institutions, which should technically considered a form of racketeering. Obviously, if anybody should be equal in front of law, in a "real" state of law, churches should equally pay taxes as corporations.

The third part of the problem are the basic human rights of birth, poverty, death, marriage and health, whereas strongly governments and churches are allied with the organized crime racket, to squeeze whatever they can from their citizens. A "civilized" country, one in the future, because nothing as such exists to our days, would nationalize and provide free this services to their citizens. Also a "civilized" country would not stick it's nose in a discriminatory way into contracts such as marriages, that should regarded the same way as business contracts. It is not the business of governments to indicate or to determine "morals". So it should be an argument left to the snake oil salesmen to discuss on sundays on their altars.

may you all live interesting times

... taking care of the bandits ...

The late 20Th century has replaced the colonialism of the countries with the colonialism of the multinationals and the currency. The dismiss of Bretton Woods agreements forced unilaterally by one country to the whole world, for its selfish benefit, has created a system of new colonialism, the colonialism of the currency.

My friend time ago asked me what was my suggestion, and I indicated the solution to the problem in consolidation of larger continental currencies. The independent choice of a pan-Arabic currency, a pan-Asian currency and a pan-Latin-American currency, would exactly sort this effect and set back the united states and the dollar where it belongs.

Unfortunately we are a long way from this, because people are easy to corrupt and most of world countries are ruled by puppets at the service of the American finance. Only when the people will start setting aside their personal dirty interest, justice will be served.

.. from a new book I'm writing: "about the empirical onthology" ...

Why governments and churches distort the concept of nature


The answer is quite simple, because is something they can turn into a profit and more political power, and use as escape goat to change subject when they are caught stealing, murdering, conspiring, you name it. They are not stealing, murdering, conspiring, they have the approval from god, they do it for god, one nation under god, they are all on a mission from god like the blues brothers.

Look for example at bisexuality, why should not be "ethical", half animals and humans in nature are bisexual. So if the answer is in the bible that states the ones that lie with their own sex should be killed, so Christians should kill all the dogs and half the Indian truck drivers ?

The real story is that the "against nature" wording is used to pursue an agenda, when is convenient. Because if people should chose to be "conformant to nature" instead than the other way, then eating your born dead babies like cats do, would be acceptable, as long as they die on their own. In fact, in Cambodia, eating dead human bodies is not a crime, as long as you don't kill them.

The whole problem with what is "against nature" depends on the subject speaking, subjects have different natures, so what is natural for one may not for another. Like for instance, since bonobos spend all day having promiscuous sex orgies, should all in the Vatican do so, to be "pro nature" ?. Now the point to make here is that morals are different things than rights of law, so if the law chooses to be legitimate, has to found its bases not on the concept of moral or nature, but on the concept of damage. A country that can not make this "distinguo", like for instance the united states, can not be called technically a "state of law".

Now it becomes suddenly clear that where there is no social damage there should be no regulating laws, but this is unfortunately a concept that bigots can not understand, so in any country successfully dominated by the church-finance "sacre" alliance, justice is not just, because punishes non-crimes that are not damaging, like consumption of light drugs, while legally permitting damaging crimes, like usury or government sponsored murder sometimes called also death penalty.

That's why bisexuals are hanged in Iran, that's why eugenetics, the base theory that led to German Nazism, was forged in the united states, or that's why Americans feel free to torture people, and also in their "grandeur" redefine the meaning of the word in the dictionary, because, like the french king sun probably would say in this circumstance, "they are the semantics".

That is also why the universal misconception that free market loving libertarians are running the united states is dead wrong. The united states are ran by an alliance of socialist-bigots and greed-obsessed-haters, where some are both, American libertarians are less than 2% in this nation, when the above crooks chat of "free market" they play with the double-sense of the word in English, what they really mean is that they want to own the world market for free.

So I would just invite humans, regardless of their country, race, tribe or species, to be more tolerant, and to start trying analyzing if the theory of damage could not be something their god they mention so much in their speeches, could like better than their own current interpretation. Maybe something they could all understand better is mentioning a Prophet that always claimed not to be one, Zoroaster, "think good deeds, do good deeds, live good", so all of you think about this words and what they mean.

... prodotti compatibili con l' ambiente che l'industria si rifiuta di vendere ...

La realta' e' che il metodo di produzione basato sulla logica consumista, anziche' sulla logica di 'prodotto eterno' distrugge l'ambiente. La soluzione non piace all' industria, che ovviamente vuole succhiare il sangue a tutti, come i vampiri, ma la realta' ecologica non si chiama 'usa e getta' ma 'usa e conserva, per sempre':

-stampanti senza caricatori (ricaricabili con inchiostro, come i plotter degli anni 80)
-gadgets alimentati con cellule fotovoltaiche senza batterie
-veicoli diesel raffreddati ad aria multicarburante con lubrificazione a perdita senza batterie (con APU o starters pneumatici), con valvole rotanti e cilindri accessibili e riparabili individualmente. Il fallimento del sistema di raffreddamento liquido e' evidente, se cosi' non fosse computers ed aeroplani sarebbero raffreddati ad acqua e non ci sarebbe nessuna necessita' di risanare ecologicamente le aree di rottamazione.
-Le emissioni vanno controllate nei riscaldamenti delle case, nelle centrali elettriche, nel trasporto pesante, nelle ciminiere delle fabbriche. Le auto sono solo una goccia nell' oceano dell' emissione nociva.
-impianti in costruzioni edili con recupero acque piovane, taniche di riserva e stabilizzazione termica sottotetto, depurazione o riutilizzo delle acque grigie, riutilizzo bio-energetico delle acque nere
-computers modulari standardizzati con moduli inter-operabili, ciclo di vita di un modulo cpu di un computer ? -> 20 anni ? . Quando ha finito il lavoro di workstation, va nei sistemi multiprocessore, e quando e' obsoleto li, va nel mondo degli 'embedded', ovviamente la logica di tutto il sistema va cambiata. Da una parte buttiamo gli 'obsoleti', e dall' altra li ricostruiamo come embedded boards, un sistema completamente senza senso.
-centrali termiche ad idrogeno, nucleare ?, no grazie, costa poco quando si costruisce, ma l'industria ha mentito, i costi di bonifica sono cento volte piu' alti delle stime, chiedetevi per un istante il perche' l' america non costruisce piu' reattori nucleari da 30 anni, poi ditemi la sola risposta che ha senso.
-bassi consumi elettrici, LED e cosi' via

... recessione ed inflazione ...

Situazione in California:
genere-------------------------------prezzo-nov-2006-------prezzo-nov-2007
benzina(al-gallone)---------------$2.00--------------------- $3.30
diesel(al-gallone)------------------$2.10----------------------$3.75
pane-(minimo)-(libbra)-----------$1.00----------------------$2.50
formaggio-(minimo)-(2-libbre)---$4.95----------------------$8.95
salame-(medio)-(2-libbre)-------$3.95----------------------$7.95
affitti, luce, acqua, telefono pressoche' identici
mutui aumentati i ratei variabili (circa 20%)
I computers costano meno
le automobili piu' o meno lo stesso, ma le vendite sono crollate
il valore degli immobili e' precipitato del 30%
Sembra che qui' il costo del carburante sia l'unico indicatore correlato al tipo di variazioni visibili:
alto costo distribuzione => diminuzione volume acquisti => recessione
recessione => disoccupazione=> fallimenti => crollo immobiliare

... a public domain project ...

Cloth manufacturing, fiber mixed with metal fiber/foil.
Lamee' technology versus a lame technology (RFID)
... amen ...

... from another new book I'm writing "Technologically progressive" ...

Modularity and interoperability would be the success key of any new mass-distributed mean of manufacturing, construction and transport.

While the materials exist, the issue is within the design logic. Most of raw parts are built in different measures to fit a design, after transformation, or custom-built, and therefore "non inter-operable".

For instance, in the case of frames, the design logic could change if we start thinking of a smaller "standard size" "interoperable" component, and of design logic of the system whereas the "design" consists on assembling the base blocks in the optimal configuration to obtain absolute oustanding performance, "without" altering the base block.

Now an air carrier can be recycled into enough modules to build two thousand homes or two thousand cars, at end of operational life, generating "positive income" at disposal, instead than the additional liability of spending more bucks to sink it in the middle of the pacific.

We have forgotten the most important phase in engineering, or we have not learned the most powerful force in nature and evolution: "disposal" and "reutilization".

We have also forgotten another critical item: "strategic reserves". Nature has its own, somewhere, of anything needed in its cycles. We do not, and we rely on industries that may not exist at the time we may need them.

Probably 90% of any structure human made can be reduced to interoperable triangles, a modest contibute from Geometry, to the miopic boxy car designers and box home builders, that can not see the round curves of the Universe.

... come e' accaduto che i "paladini della liberta' nell' occidente" stiano divenendo i burattinari architetti del nuovo incubo mondiale ...

Questo e' quel che l' America era:

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759), quoting Cesare Beccaria

Questo e' quel che l' America e' oggi:

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans."
-- William Jefferson Clinton, USA Today, March 11, 1993.

"The American standard of life is not in discussion" -- George Bush (before the invasion of Afghanistan)

In parole povere, interpretando fra le righe della alleanza santa di queste due famiglie, che ora guida il paese da venti anni, e probabilmente continuera' a farlo con qualche nuova scusa, lo standard di vita rimarra' uguale in america per i pochi figli dell' oca bianca, "non gente qualunque". Neppure la gente qualunque in america, ha piu' diritti, figuriamoci gli alleati esteri, o addirittura i non alleati.

Non sembra questo un chiaro progetto su scala mondiale, volto a mandare al collasso tutte le economie del mondo, per poi comprare a prezzi stracciati cosa rimane ? (proprio come in russia, direbbe il mio amico di san francisco). La realta' sembra essere che i paesi che non permettono il "lassez faire" richiesto per fagocitare le loro economie, vengono attaccati militarmente, e quelli che lo permettono vengono distrutti finanziariamente.

In parole povere, in guerra o in economia, loro attuano la politica dei "larghi orizzonti" cosi' come De Gaulle all' epoca dell' uscita dall' alleanza militare della nato, giustamente, intraprese.

Ora la conclusione. Se non c'e' parita' di relazione non c'e' alleanza. Lasciategli fare la loro nuova nato nei paesi dell' est. Non c'e' ragione per alcun paese europeo di sottostare ad una relazione-capestro, non basata su parita di diritti. Se loro ci considerano nemici comunque, perche' essere compromessi in una politica internazionale lurida come "alleati".

Non sarebbe forse meglio adottare la saggezza del Generalissimo, che di fronte ad una guerra oviiamente demenziale, decise la neutralita' della Spagna ? Forse, alla resa dei conti, l' america finira' per attaccare anche l'europa, ma se siamo abbastanza fortunati, con una politica di neutralita' la lista di altri paesi da attaccare prima di noi e lunga lunga.

Personalmente, io leggo in questa gente, quando parlano, la realta' dei fatti. Leggo nella loro mente gli insulti, leggo nel loro linguaggio del corpo il disgusto del fatto che devono mantenere una conversazione falso-cortese quando parlano con qualcuno che non e' "dei loro", o anche con i loro inferiori, perche' il classismo e la discriminazione castale, qui, sono la regola.

Percio' non aspettatevi che questa sia la stessa gente del 45, quella era brava gente, ma i pochi rimasti sono negli ospedali geriatrici. Quelli che sono cresciuti qui' nel dopoguerra, sono stati indottrinati in uno "stato di polizia" dove l' unico concetto comune e' la loro "superiorita" e desiderio di "dare lezioni" a tutto il resto del mondo, quelli che, dicono loro, "non hanno standards", perche' per parafrasare il re sole "lo standard sono loro".

... per tutti quelli che vogliono in europa un sistema sanitario simile a quello americano ...

Quando gli ipocriti (tutti rigorosamente cristiani, ce ne fosse uno ateo), parlano di "diritto alla vita" intendono "diritto alla vita che fa comodo a loro, politicamente", nel gioco del potere della casta.

Questo e' praticamente il risultato di un sistema di assistenza medica sul modello statunitense. Chi puo' pagare paga. Chi non puo' pagare ed e' servo delle chiese riceve la carita', e chi non puo' pagare muore.

Da chi e' stato inventato questo sistema ? Dalle multinazionali statunitensi, che lo hanno imposto al paese grazie a politici svenduti al miglior offerente. Ora stanno tentando di esportare questo modello CRIMINALE anche in Canada, dove vogliono distruggere il sistema sanitario pubblico con lo stesso metodo, comprando i politici.

Certo, il mercato internazionale di organi umani e' una grande e redditizia risorsa, per gli assassini legalizzati delle corporazioni del ventunesimo secolo, che si sentono nel diritto di monopolizzare il mercato della vita e della morte, perche' loro come dice il dio dollaro, "confidano in dio".

Praticamente un nuovo sistema legalizzato per assassinare chi non e' "conforme" alla logica del potere. Un sistema evoluto, non classificabile come "genocidio" perche' non fa' distinzione di razza, ma solo di censo o di sottomissione religiosa (l'uno o l'altro, i dollari o la carita' del prelato).

Dai tempi dell' eugenetica e dell' AG Farben che supportava l'olocausto, solo una cosa e' cambiata, il metodo, quanto piu' subdolo perche' invisibile, ma sempre basato su tendenze omofobiche verso qualche categoria bersaglio di un paese che si sente investito da dio in persona del diritto di decidere di vita e morte del prossimo.

Pensate per un momento che chiunque vi sia caro, sia destinato nel disegno celle caste di potere, a corto o a lungo termine, a divenire un nullatenente ammalato in mezzo alla strada. Pensate per un momento che chiunque vi sia caro, un giorno, debba morire perche' non puo' pagare il conto dell' ospedale. Questo e' il disegno dei cleptocrati, clericali o monetari che siano non fa' alcuna differenza.

Invito tutti gli amici, e tutti i cittadini in Europa, alla RESISTENZA, non a parole, ma nei fatti. Quando i governi corrotti dalle multinazionali tentino di cambiare leggi, pensate che voi, le vostre mogli, i vostri parenti e i vostri figli, molto probabilmente diverranno tutti potenziali vittime di questo sistema che non ammette dissenso.

Questo non e' un discorso di politica di partito, ma di logica omofobica, di odio e vittimizzazione della dignita' umana, percio' destra, sinistra o centro, non hanno alcun significato, ma l' unica domanda da porsi e' "hanno diritto costoro di determinare vita e morte ?", ed anche "negare cure mediche e speculare su organi umani, puo' essere considerato un crimine contro l'umanita?". Per me la risposta e' ovvia.

E' necessario introdurre in ambito europeo legislazione che limiti il tipo di impresa autorizzata ad operare nell ambito della comunita'. Poiche' non esiste metodo per controllare l'industria multinazionale estera, allo stadio di produzione, sarebbe bene proibire l'operato in europa di multinazionali estere che agiscano in settori strategici per la sopravvivenza umana. Cio' include non solo il campo medico e sanitario, ma anche settori come chimica, biogenetica e bioingegneria.

Se cio' non fosse possibile, come al solito a causa della corruzione generata da questi soggetti, non rimarrebbe alla gente altra alternativa, se non la RESISTENZA, non a parole, non con gli scioperi della fame, non con i cortei, ma con la azione concreta, come nel 43, per davvero. Gente di questo tipo, ed i loro tirapiedi e servi politici ed industriali, meritano di penzolare dai balconi, e' ora che il mondo se ne renda conto.

Il fine ultimo di questi cialtroni e' il dio dollaro, e quando l'europa sottovaluti il rischio legato a tale logica, il vecchio continente sarebbe esso stesso a rischio di fare fine simile al genocidio degli indiani d'america o degli schiavi d'africa.

... from a new book I'm writing: "about the empirical onthology" ...

Apparently the churches have never heard of the roman expression "medice cura te ipso".

The history of churches appears to present a consistent pattern of abuse within the centuries, so why should anybody expect such abuse to be ended now ?, maybe because they repented from their sins and self-absolved themselves ?, or because "they state" a god nobody has ever seen "forgave their crimes ?". Therefore while the concept of ethics and spirituality could be synonym of a legitimate humanist concern, the empirical evidence of the behavior of churches, makes church ethics an oxymoron.

Certain worlds have traditionaly become feuds of such abuse, such as the "vountarism and charity" industry and the retail industry. Within the charity and voluntarism industry, such vision is perpetuated in organizing services for the religiously submitted desperates, so that a high level of power is achieved by the religious referents whenever some dirty work to save them is needed.

Whitin the religiously obedient retail industry, such path is perpetuated with the same kind of connivence, and the word tweakers (note the expression of common language of drug "dealers"), and dealers are synonyms, for instance. Not that I may have anything against tweakers, "per se". The problem lays in deeper reasoning schemas of the industry, whereas further oxymorons like "business ethics" are used. There is no such ethics as "business ethics", there is either one or the other, unless you are a non profit corporation distributing free commodities and services, that is the only possible "ethic business".

The results of such logic, added with the enourmous social value of forgiving sins, creates a society where tweakers manage or sabotage the others, either in religion, or business or both, because obviously the "motivation" of any tweaker is wide stronger than the one of anybody normal, and in absence of real ethics, substituted by the profit logic oxymoron of "business ethics", is self explanatory of why the system tends to stabilize into the pyramid of tweakers.

That's why anytime I hear the words "faith", "motivation" or "ethics" I suddenly feel in need to go look for a rifle. I learned with the years, that people concerned about real ethics, use more wording as "fair profit", and "human natural rights", instead than than the prior ones. Humans that preach godness and have dirt in their yard, are the best "empirical" evidence of the historical connection and jerarchical relation between the sinners and the ones that "forgive" sins, and indicate clearly that religions in general are type of cults, and organized religion itself is a form of constitutionally protected racketeering, whereas constitutions are unfortunatelly not worded to make a distinguo with the legitimate and natural right of choice of spiritual belief, and businesses or other forms of association that call themselves religions.

Nietzsche wrote " ... has not observed life carefully, the one that has not seen the 'charitable' hand that kills ... ". We would add, "has forgotten history as well", and the "charitable" hand is the one above. They wont kill you in their church or business, but they'll make your life miserable, they'll conspire lying about you with their employees and congregations, they'll manipulate your family against you, they'll slave you until you are sick and with no energies, they'll discriminate you on anything you do, they'll make evident to their disciples you are "fair game", so the "seculars", the ones criminal under them that had their sins absolved by their god, could target you more effectivelly.

Unfortunatelly, in the western definition of "state of law", the provvisions of rackeetering don't include such physical and juridical subjects, nor the ignorance of the people helps in applying the existing legislations to destroy such types of rackeetering, because the ignorant folk can not see the danger of the hate churches produce.

I'm sure however that the survivers of the second war concentration camps, can see the the historical and empirical conclusions here. The thousand of years of faith related wars, for the ones that believe in historical evidence, should leave no doubt. The burning crosses in the southern states should leave no doubt. The terror regimes of theocracies should leave no doubts.

So we want to extend an invitation to any human being valuing ethics and spirituality, to extend an inter-faith message to each other, to stop supporting organized religion, to stop meeting in their locations, to resign from works where religious talks are made, and to start assembling in public parks, with other people of good will, orderly, in small groups and at different times, to discuss the real issues of life and death, without having to support the snake oil god salesmen of the churches and their politics, in the process.

Any political issue of spiritual concern can be adressed in a civilized manner, by universal ballot. There is no reason of "representatives" middlemen milking the cow, neither in the feuds of organized religion nor in the political one. Time to go back to DIRECT democracy, since the indirect representatives trusted deserve no trust, at the bottom line, "the people" do.

... trends ...

... possible effects of weaker dollar ...

penalized:
-foreign cars, computers and airplane makers
-foreign banks and real estate market
-american distributers of foreign goods
-(soon) american oil companies

advantaged:
-american banks and real estate market
-american manufacturers
-american high tech industry
-foreign distributers of american goods
-gold traders

short terms effects:
-increased solvancy of foreign debt
-real reduction of value of foreign and domestic debt
-effects of devaluation could possibly extend penalizing other stock markets (asia)
-conversion of asian treasury credit into purchases may create us shortages of liquidity

possible induced damages:
-us government troubles on funding national budget
-increase of crisis in foreign banking systems and stock markets
-defaults in foreign loans
-depreciation of foreign real assets
-increase of crysis in foreign manufacturers
-foreign political changes of regimes in most indebited countries
-increased hostility towards american financial system
-chain of devaluation extending to other markets (asia and europe)
-foreign unemployment

... history keeps repeating itself ...
... the beneficiary seems to be always wall street ...

... subjects ...

In the little prince, there is a mention that more or less sounds like 'monarchs have no peers, only subjects'. However, the king in the little prince is a very wise king, that listens of what his subjecs say, need and want, and exercises power in that direction.

I wish this was the situation in amerika, but unfortunatelly is not. Amerikans see foreigners as 'subjects', therefore we have to assume amerikans are all kings.

Anyways, if anybody in the world would ever think this people here would consider them peers, think again, they dont, and they never will, they have been indoctrinated and grown on the myth of the american supremacy, and they think that they are a superior race just because they are born in amerika.

Amerika is no longer just a plutocracy, but is now also a kleptocracy.

... about glass recycling ...

Ok, here is the situation in northern california:
-glass and plastic bottles go in the garbage, weigh too much or are too big in volume, and have a redemption value not justifying collecting them, or nobody wants them, like happens with wine bottles.
-seems to me quite of a huge amount of glass and plastic, so I'm asking myself why there is no separate collection of glass and plastic in a separate can, like in the nations that don't have so high standards like amerika
... just my five cents ...
... I hope amerikans that know everyting by statute under god, may not be offended by such a suggestion, by a poor non-amerikan peon ...

... how amerika is being framed ...

From The Washington Post of 2006/02/15:
South Riding, Va.: Which is worse?
- Knowing that there are hackers controlling botnets, or
- Knowing that companies like JP Morgan Chase, Cingular, T-Mobile, Monster.com and Expedia.com will pay for their ads to appear on the computers on the botnet?
It would seem to me that part of the solution is to convince the big companies to stop paying 180solutions to distribute their ads.

now, for a minute, think of this:

-the government, the industry and any other spammers now have the power to target, for whatever "agenda" they may have, the mail address of the people they dislike, with the spam "designed" to trigger the electronic surveillance on them (like keywords of the kind "anarchism", "terrorism" and so forth).

... nice, not even orwell had tought of such perversion level ...